Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: robthewordsmith Date: Jul 31, 2011 2:30pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

http://www.archive.org/post/356205/oh-feel-that-hidden-feminine-polarity-feel-it-and-embrace-it-this-is-true

All this example, where JH and I went toe to toe at great and amusing length, does is convince me that I'm right about his non-Kochman status. Sorry, D - we'll just have to differ on this one.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: unclejohn52 Date: Aug 1, 2011 10:49am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

Guess I'd have to agree: edit : post removed due to insufficient evidence. My bad.


This post was modified by unclejohn52 on 2011-08-01 17:49:17

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Aug 1, 2011 10:44am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

I take it all back...my bad.

This post was modified by William Tell on 2011-08-01 17:44:05

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: snow_and_rain Date: Jul 31, 2011 3:10pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Back on track: an un-scientific straw poll

If by some miracle JH isn't Kochman, then he's still enough of a douchebag to deserve that moniker anyway.